“The story is in the DIFFERENCE.”

Top-down economic analyses won’t tell us what really matters to communities adapting their agriculture to climate change. Photo: N. Palmer (CIAT)
Top-down economic analyses won’t tell us what really matters to communities adapting their agriculture to climate change. Photo: N. Palmer (CIAT)

Abrar Chaudhury isn’t a fan of top down adaptation costing. “Top down, purely econometric approaches usually way underestimate the true costs of adaptation,” he says. But he also says that a bottom up, community directed approach isn’t necessarily the answer either.

“The real story,” he asserts, “is in the difference between the two.”

Chaudhury’s work involves the use of a new community adaptation prioritization and planning tool called Participatory Social Return on Investment (PSROI). PSROI builds on traditional Social Return on Investment methods – which normal focus on economic analysis of pre-determined interventions – by integrating a participatory, community-driven component.

At a meeting of the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) just prior to the Second Global Conference on Agricultural Research for Development (GCARD2) in Punta del Este, Uruguay, Chaudhury explained how discrepancies between external climate change adaptation costing efforts and community-based costing efforts like PSROI can reveal what the people affected by climate change truly value.

In Kochiel, Kenya, for example, agricultural matters are all but a secondary concern. The people of Kochiel need a medical clinic. Their view: if they don’t have their health, why bother with agriculture? What’s more, why bother with climate change?

“If I were to go into that community and start pushing some other adaptation intervention, it would totally fail,” said Chaudhury. Looking at why community values are potentially different from technical expert values can help pinpoint factors that might be preventing the success of adaptation interventions.

More importantly, it can point researchers and policy makers towards changes that might actually…make a difference!

Attendees of the GCARD2 conference this week will be looking to incorporate Chaudhury’s PSROI work into a plan of action for agricultural research for development, one that develops the key partnerships necessary to enact meaningful change.

For more information on CCAFS’ work on PSROI, visit the CCAFS webpage.

Stay updated with happenings at the GCARD2 conference on the GCARD2 Social Reporting Platform.

Blogpost by Caity Peterson, one of the GCARD2 social reporters.

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s