Industrious ants, or lone leopards?

Learning to use the CCAFS scenarios tool helps stakeholders envision how to arrive at a better future under a variety of possible circumstances.
Learning to use the CCAFS scenarios tool helps stakeholders envision how to arrive at a better future under a variety of possible circumstances.

A detective solves a mystery by starting from the end result – the crime scene – and working backwards to determine the cause – the crime. The same logic, called backcasting, is also the key to climate change adaptation and development.

Joost Vervoort, scenarios officer for the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), and Katindi Sivi Njonjo (Society for International Development – Kenya) spoke to a group of CCAFS stakeholders as a prelude to the Second Global Conference on Agricultural Research for Development (GCARD2) in Punta del Este, Uruguay, which kicks off tomorrow.

The development of climate scenarios is a strategy that governments and community members can use not only to envision their future, but to “backcast” to identify the key steps necessary to arrive at the future. “We don’t just give them [community members] scenarios,” emphasized Vervoort, “we give them the TOOLS to develop scenarios.”

Vervoort maintains that this distinction is crucial if the concept of scenario-building is to be taken up and used after CCAFS researchers exit the picture. Which is why, noted Njonjo, CCAFS uses a stakeholder-driven approach.

In East Africa, for example, civil society and private sector actors conceptualize how they might arrive at a shared vision of the future given a variety of potential scenarios. The “industrious ant” scenario involves working with a cooperative, unified government that plans ahead for adaptation. The “herd of zebras” is unified, but reactive. “Lone leopards are proactive, but fragmented, while “sleeping lions” are completely individualistic and concerned with the status quo, making them the most difficult to work with. Stakeholders must come up with a way to achieve their future vision under any one of these possible scenarios.

The result of the scenarios process is a robust plan, one that could work under a variety of different circumstances. More importantly, it is understandable by everyone and thus easy to identify with and put into action. After all, enabling successful development in the face of climate change shouldn’t have to be detective work.

Stay updated with happenings at the GCARD2 conference on the GCARD2 Social Reporting Platform

For more information on CCAFS scenarios work in East Asia, view the Report on Regional Scenarios Development for East Africa.

Blogpost by Caity Peterson, one of the GCARD2 social reporters.


One thought on “Industrious ants, or lone leopards?

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s